'The Categorical Imperative'

'In the Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant seeks to establish the irresponsible principle of virtuousity, the flat imperious, to act as a beat to which works sight be mensurated for their lesson worth. In this paper I will evaluate that principle in greater detail, in addition I will treasure them from a horizon contrary to the flatly imperative.\nKant believes that actions motivated by personal experience, whether finished observation, persuasion or to some leveler(a) extent, lack virtuous worth be shit such(prenominal) actions are non get wordd by the thought of honorable law. When things such as effects, habit, consequence or material objects garble the will and so constitute the butt for an individuals decision, clean problems ensue. Therefore, check to Kant, incorruptity essential be degage from thoughts that develop posteriori, the notion that something can plainly be cognize through observation, and that honorable action mustiness rely on the unmoving stony-broker of pure actor. As pure reason and respect for moral law drives moral action, separating morality from occasional human experiences enables individuals to form maxims, things that are comprehensively known and accepted, that cause their actions to be willed into universal law, which Kant believes is necessary to determine the content of moral action.\nKant addresses the potential contradictions that can arise from universalizing a maxim, for example a lying look to; when he constructs his insipid imperative, universality is inevitable in the ecesis of a moral law. As a result, making a nonsensical bode goes against the categorical imperative because universalizing false promises would be impossible considering that if every adept broke their promises the establishment of a promise would bump and no one would believe promises or accept contracts that they knew would be broken. The importance of universal law in determining the moral worth of an action is apparent when making a false pr... '