Hester Prynne Sanction :: essays research papers

Hester Prynne SanctionThe persistent issue of corporate avengement has been the proverbial prickle in the side of some people throughout history. Corporations have causedmany people huge amounts of both physical and emotional pain imputable to instances ofimproper mechanical maintenance, ignorance towards the environment, and themanufacture of life threatening products. The main line of work that lies as anobstacle in front of prosecutors of these green goddesss is, who do they punish?The headmaster Chancellor of England questioned, Did you ever expect a corporation tohave a conscience, when it has no soul to be damned, and no body to be kicked?myriad victims throughout history have been perplexed to come up with asolution to answer the Chancellors question. How preserve people throw a corporationin jail, or have them compensate for their immeasurable losses? In his work TheHester Prynne Sanction, Peter French analyses ways in which the courts support stir how they punish cor porations more effectively. This essay will take a overcritical look at Frenchs solution, examining if it is an effective and morallyjustified fashion of dense corporations.In our society, retributive ideals have been implanted in us, as the noteworthy biblical eye for an eye concept seems to be societys manner with whichwe punish criminals. This is an interesting case though, because corporationsdont simply have one case-by-case they can place the blame upon. Rather, they arecomprised of hundreds or unconstipated thousands of people, and on that pointfore there is noextensive punishment prosecutors can place upon everybody who is employed by acorporation. In a famous case in inch involving Ford Pinto whose costbenefit analysis regarding the redesign of the gas tank gondola on the Pinto cost aperson his life. The firm ended up paying $200,000, but how can you place aprice on human life? And furthermore, who can you go after for retribution? The manoeuvre who drew up the plans ? The CEO who approved the change? Or even theFactory worker who placed the new tank in the car? None of them, according tothe current laws, writes French. The idea that a corporation can pay a courtfine or a mend sum to the relatives of its victim in a homicide case, andtherefore expiate its guilt trip is, however, regarded by many people as a shocking diss to justice. Very few of these cases can be directly linked toindividual negligence or intentional recklessness, and the fines can easily be compose off as business expenses. The corporations usually recover fines quicklyby means of higher prices. This poses a major problem for society, because the