Ethics and Leadership in Engineering

Engineers play a significant part in the development, prosperity and safety of people around the globe. The primary role of engineers is to identify/ wizard and respond to a need by constructing or creating a antecedent with certain circumstantial guidelines. art object it is the commerce of engineers to develop such structures, it is similarly their responsibility that their creation serves the function in a proper manner, get word alone told safety precautions speckle making it and give the safety direfulctions to the users aft(prenominal) handing it over.DiscussionThese structures, however, do non stay safe forever. No consider how safe a construction or a creation is, it reveals its hardship after virtuallytime. Eventually these failures lead to dire consequences some time. Engineers struggle all the time to avoid failures and make their solution safer and more efficient. Sometime guiltless lacking of nonrecreational ethics is the reason.In UK, the seriousness o f honourable issues, which plagiarise in skipper lives of engineers, has been recognized recently. However, in USA this has been recognized for some time. Their universities offer substantial guidance and support to their professionals. The Royal Academy of Engineering, in 2005, initiated the process and brought its publishing in the form of Statement of Ethical Principles, which outlines the specific ways in which engineers across UK ar committed to upholding certain ethical values.During the same time, UK Engineering Council amended its standards for chartered and incorporated engineers, in orderliness to increase awareness of ethical issues. It appears that this has resulted in having a profound pith as many universities produce incorporated ethical perspective in their studies.Professional Engineers strive to develop solutions that improve the health and safety conditions for the social welfare of society. The statement of Ethical Principles sets standards for profession al Engineers (Statement of Ethical Principles. 2005). It presents four principles that guide engineers in their professional duties. It includes Accuracy and Rigour, Honesty and Integrity, Respect for life, Law and the Public Good, and liable loss leadership.Accuracy and Rigour means, Engineers have the responsibility to acquire and sustain the study pertinent to their practices they should also keep their knowledge up to date. It is also the responsibility to always act with care as their profession overlooks a self-coloured commitment. They should only perform their services in the field of relevant competence. Since the technical foul knowledge, an Engineer can understand are not easy for the others, therefore, it is the duty of engineers to not knowingly mislead others as it can have dire consequences and therefore unethical.Honesty and Integrity means engineers should act with high standards of professional ethics. They should not accept any bribery or questionable defray ment from anyone. They should act in the best interest of employer, unless it is not in negate with rights of the other party.Respect for Life, Law and the Public Good, entails that engineers should be aware of relevant laws and regulations and should work accordingly. Conservation of nature and its resources should be a priority. They should act in the best manner that does not bring bad image to their profession. obligated Leadership involves practicing high level of standards and leadinghip in the management of technology. extend awareness to the public. Listen to the concern of the society.Adhering to these principles will bring good mention to the profession and will make sure that it achieves what it is meant to be, welfare of society. However, we can have numerous examples from the past, of such negligence and improper conduct in this value profession. In past successive accidents of railway occurred in UK, which were later fully investigated. These include the acciden t of Clapham Junction rail pall, on 12 declination 1988.35 people killed while 100 injured, when oncoming train ran into wreckage. some other on, 19 September 1997, Southall rail crash, killed 6 people and 150 injured. It occurred because of a collision with freight train. On 5 October 1999, Ladbroke Grove rail crash happened, when train passed the signal at danger and resulted in the head on collision, killed 21 while 523 injured. Investigation reports show that these could have been prevented by well-timed action of professional engineers. In America, a TV Antenna tugboat collapsed in 1982, killing several people. Later investigation showed that safety measures were not taken as should have been (Uff, 2012, Pp13).ConclusionEngineering is a practically respected profession. This respect demands responsibility. Adhering to rules that there arise ethical responsibilities too. However, if professional engineers stick to the four principles and apply them in their activities, it will surely carry more value to this profession for sure.Running Head leadership techniquesManagers do things right, while leaders do the right thing.Name of writerName of institutionManagers do things right, while leaders do the right thingThesis StatementManagers do things right, while leaders do the right thing.IntroductionLeaders piddle and change cultures, while autobuss and administrators live within them. (Edward Schein)Managers do things right, while leaders do the right thing. Leader also sounds similar to the tutor to the frequent man. But we know there are subtle divergencys. It takes a wholly contrastive approach to become a leader. These subtle differences create the difference that is visible in performances of organizations.There have been many theories on leadership and management. Talking about whether a manager is born or developed, what styles are of management exist and which is appropriate. Also, what a leader does, where his/her power comes from. First of all we will differentiate between a leader and a manager. because(prenominal) we will discuss some models and theories related to it.DiscussionThe role of a manager is to achieve goals effectively and efficiently, by planning, organizing, co-ordinating and controlling. The importance of time is immense. On the other hand, leaders create and communicate a vision, then bring up their followers towards achieving that vision. Leaders create a culture of shared values, beliefs and rituals to contest the status quo. Managers use position authority to make subordinates work towards goals. firearm leaders motivate and inspire their followers to achieve their goals.Today the singularity theory (born leaders) is criticized more. It is argued that even leadership has different styles, which are learned with start rather than born traits (Daft, 2003, Pp.518). Ashridge Management College did enquiry and found four major(ip) classifications of management styles. Tells, sells, consults, join. In tell style, the manager is autocratic, making a conclusion and imposing it on others. In sell style, manager still makes a decision on self like basis, but try to rationalize the logic behind it. In consult style, manager makes decision but in consultation with his/her subordinates. The most democratic style is join style, where manager himself becomes part of the team that makes joint decisions, and also claims the responsibility of that decision afterwards. explore indicates managers are generally thought to be having told or sell style. While employees prefer consult style. Choosing which style is more appropriate, depends on several factors. calamity approach by Charles Handy suggests that four factors need to be unsounded to answer this question. The environment, task or people, trust or control, liking or respect (Schermerhorn 2012, Pp.266). Each particular combination of these factors results in a different situation and, therefore, requires a different tailore d approach of management towards it (Robbins & Judge, 2010, Pp.393). dinero and Harvard identified two basic types of leaders. Task oriented and people or relation oriented leaders. Both have their own advantages and disadvantages. Ohio state research suggests that task orientation and people orientation can be achieved concurrently they are not mutually exclusive. Blakes management grid proves this research by suggesting rather than asking a question that a manager should be task or people oriented ask to what bound a manager should be task and people oriented (Daft, 2003, Pp.522).Managers and leaders differ in their approaches towards performing similar tasks. The approach of management is subroutine in nature. They like to work under conditions of certainty, strive to gain as much information as they gain, take relatively less risk. Leaders on the hand challenge the status quo. They talk about ever-changing the culture and create followers with their motivation and persuasions skills. Leaders create a shared culture towards achieving the vision that followers own.ConclusionWho is best, a leader or manager is, however, a question depending on what needs to be accomplished. If it is a routine or not so dynamic environment, then decision tilts in favour towards manager. While if it involves dealing with changing and fluctuate situation with lots of risk involved then it will require the initiative approach of a leader.