Definition Of Treating Everyone Fairly

Definition Of Treating E very(prenominal) ane FairlyThe application of common pedestalards or homogeneous treatment does non necessarily re jelle respect for a many unriv all toldeds spirit or individualism. Individuals back endnot create their own opportunities as they ar state provided. tribe should be free to choose which job they postulate to do. Many good deal refexercising that concernity of opportunity exists in democratic societies. There atomic number 18 some arguments that equality is of no importance to most heap out-of-pocket to the fact that they do not shed an equal economic or social status. It can be too argued, that rich hatful restrain bulkyer opportunities in education and employment as they argon in an beneficial situation because of their wealth. akinwise, an separate thing to mention is that there is a prejudice from the past years until today against some racial conventions and women, which situates them in a disadvantageous position a s they postulate no skillful to equal opportunities.Opportunities in any social system atomic number 18 indomitable not only by ability, commitment, interest, corruption and luck exactly also by the unpredictable physical and serviceman environment. Opportunities can be in wholly equalized only by controlling the physical environment and homo being air into predictable patterns. During the years the realization dawned that it was impossible not only to drive every wholeness on the same(p) starting line yet to expect them to gloss to hold backher1. For a democratic society to exist there must(prenominal) be semipolitical opportunities, economic opportunities as to get hold of wealth and prosperity. every last(predicate) anti-Semite(prenominal) laws should be removed. Official discriminatory practices should be terminated and care should be ex unraveled to the less advantaged without penalizing others2.Despite the colour of our skin, the place where we were born, our faith we altogether have the right-hand(a) to be hardened plumb. But what does fairly crocked? Does it mean equality, common meters, that we are all the same or that we have to be toughened according our differences?The term social divergence is a wide term which represents all the societies in our days. Facing the hassle of social inequality we can recognize two distinct aspects. The low gearly is the distri justive one which is related on how the variety of factors, such as education, wealth, occupation and so on, are distributed in the society. The second one is ground on how the individuals are related to all(prenominal) other in a system of groups. When talking about equality we are basically mean the equal opportunities, it also values population from being discriminated on the grounds of religion, disability, age, side or familiar orientation.Aristotle stated that referee is thought to be equality and so it is, but for equals, not for everybody. In equality is also thought to be just and so it is, but for un steadys, not for everybody3. Also, in his paper Justice as Fairness, John Rawls set out two beliefs. Firstly, that each person participating in a practice, or affected by it, has an equal right to the most extensive liberty compatible with a like liberty for all. And secondly, that inequalities are arbitrary unless it is reasonable to expect that they will follow out out for everyones advantage, and provided the positions and offices to which they attach, or from which they may be gained, are open to all4.In 1950s British government, while facing a task with labour shortage, turned its face to the British colonies and ex-colonies and as a result, immigrants were busy in low-status jobs. Since the immigrant labour was very cheap, the money that the British government rescue should have been used for improving the conditions under which the immigrants were living. Therefore, this never happened since the number of imm igrants increased. However, immigrants were legitimate as workers by the British people but they were socially unwelcomed, and this brocaded new racial stereotypes in the fall in terra firma.There is a plead that when people are in a comparable situation, they should be treated in an equal manner. As Castberg stated, Everywhere , a law which for type imposed special taxes on person with long arms or short legs, red hair or big ears would be regarded as unjust and unwarrantable, irrespective of whether the law was correctly applied in ossification with its content5. However, equality does not mean that people should be treated in the same manner even if they are considered to fall in the same class because this disregards peoples differences.Discrimination has a big effect in public relating to any analysis of piece rights and can be a problem which occurs in relation to equality before the law. No human being is equal in every respect and can be distinguished not only by men tal and physical attributes but also by their particular circumstances. It is these various differences that lead to acts and for which appear to be disparity. There are numerous situations whereby each human being must not be treated equally otherwise where is the freedom from discrimination?By equality before the law we mean that when a law is made, each person must be treated in the same way. Equal protection of the law is when applying or enforcing a law which has already been implemented, there should be no variantiation except on a rational and justifiable basis, something which does not create inequality, and as already mentioned, no human being can be treated equally. As an slip of the above, traditionally, people and particularly men, are biased against women claiming that women should be focused on their family having a nurturing role. This is like trapping women and removing their freedom of excerpt as to what they want to do with their exserts. Is like denying women their right to choose by restricting their choice between mother-hood and career. Durkheim, deals with the sexual separation in the labour and he states that in the past the gap between men and women was smaller, women retired from public affairs and war and focused her attention only to her family. In in a flashadays, womans situation is differentiated from that of man, who has now realized that women are able to participate in the same activities as them.An illustration of the fact that people are treated differently is that homosexuals in the past could not serve in the army. But, in 1973 the military allowed homosexuals to get into the army. approximately may claim that the fact that different Acts and rules apply for homosexuals it is itself discriminatory since it distinguishes them from the other people. However, the law itself previously was discriminatory and the new law is nada more than positive discrimination and an improvement towards equality. In addition, in 2001 Netherlands was the first country which allowed the marriage between people with the same sex. United Kingdom government introduced the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007. Moreover, most of the other countries have the polished partnership and as a result of that there is a different status between heterosexuals and homosexuals. This equals to inferiority and inequality.Accordingly, another thing to consider is whether all societies can follow a particular ideology or whether it is indispensable to have many different ideologies which are based on different types of societies. By homogeneous society we mean a society where the citizens have the same values, heathenity, language and religion. In our days it is difficult to find such homogeneous societies since we all have different language, religion, culture and so on. Especially, the United Kingdom is a multi heathenism society, so it is not possible for the people to live in one homogeneous society. Therefore, in at once, there are some examples of such societies, such as Japanese society, Chinese and some African tribes. Hence, if societies have different natures and essences, they naturally call for different programmes, plans, ideals. In this case, one single ideology cannot be applied to all of them6. raft in a way tend to other each other and tend to think of themselves different, not necessarily better, but at least different. mass all over the world are biased, feeling that they do not belong anywhere, that they are strangers, or that they are sub-humans. The only word that comes in my mind when thinking of that is racism. Every group in this world tends to put some timeworns for itself and criticizes people consequently, so anyone who meets with these standards belongs to the group and anyone who does not meet with them is the other. Other, can be called a person with a different nationality, social class, religion, political ideology and many other types. Emmanuel Levinas sta ted, act in such a way that you always respect the absolute singularity of the other, and/or the irreducibility of otherness.If we look around us, around the whole world, we will realize that racism is an daily phenomenon, but through the history we have learned that two group of people have treated really bad and discriminated, the women and the black people. People have abandoned an idea that black people are people with no education, uncivilized and that white people are at the expire of the hierarchy, and that is just because they have a different colour. They accept the fact that they do not belong in the community and that they do not have the same rights as the white people. But they do have rights and they should stand for them.Today, the blacks can be considered equal to the whites. They are no longer prevented from passing to certain schools, restaurants, or libraries. They can even participate in political sympathies and this can be seen clearly in the United States s ince its President nowadays is Barak Obama, who is a black person7.The French Declaration was the declaration of men, citizen and others. Does this mean that women are not included? In fact, women did not have a right to vote until 1944 and also, until the 20th century they did not have a right to education and employment. Still, in nowadays women have not reached the flower of the status of valet de chambre. The Universal Declaration of human Rights, states that all men are born equal in rights and in dignity. This is evidently a great fallacy. People are not born equal but altogether unequal. Indeed, infancy and childhood are the best examples of human inequality and dependence upon others, upon parents, family members and community networks, within which human life starts, develops and ends8.After the French Revolution, slaveholding was abolished but this was not permanent. The human prototype enjoying the rights of the declarations was not only phallic but also white. The F rench declaration, as well as the following declarations was not concerned with gender or race. Edmund Burke regarding the rights in the declarations give tongue to that they are not universal or absolute they do not belong to abstract men but to particular people in concrete societies with their infinitive modification of circumstances, tradition and legal entitlement9.Marx criticized that humane Rights that turns real people into abstract ciphers. Also, the man of human rights is abstract and empty. They promote the interest of a very concrete person, the selfish and possessive individual of capitalism. The subject of human rights loses her concrete identity, with its class, gender and ethnic characteristics all real human determinations are sacrificed on the altar of the abstract man lacking history and mise en scene10. Karl Marx. in the Critique of the Gotha Programme, stated that Right by its very nature can consist only in the application of an equal standard but unequal in dividuals (and they would not be different individuals if they were not unequal) are measurable only by an equal point of view, are interpreted from one definite side onlyOne worker is married, another is not one has more children than another and so on and so forth.. To avoid all these defects, right instead of being equal would have to be unequal11.All human beings are equally entitled to some rights, pitying Rights, despite their sex nationality, religion, colour or any other status. We are all different but all equal. So how can we use our Human Rights, do they really make a difference? The fact that they exist does not make it impossible for people to violate them as it is an everyday phenomenon in every part of the world. People, even governments may affirm that they act in a way that protects human rights, but as a result their actions are found to be in intrusion of basic rights. Hence, they may use those rights in order to defence their action which are prima facie immor al.Human Rights try to form humanity. As we have seen from the genocides some are considered humans, others not. Some have more humanity than others. This is because even though we are considered the same, not all people are in the first place the same and in order to become the same they first accept to be considered inferior. creation has many different types. A type of humanity can be considered the fact that thousands of babies in Iraq die every calendar month because of the Western embargo and many babies in Africa die seventeen propagation more than Europeans babies. Those people found to be in a very low situation of humanity. In addition, poor people in sub-Saharan Africa who are expected to live thirty years less than the intermediate can also be characterized as fewer humans than the other people. Another group of people, who are ill-treated, are the people who have sexual orientations or race and can be considered as imperfect humans.Humanity is therefore a graded an d ranked status with many shades and tires between the superhuman Western, white heterosexual male at the one end and the non human, the concentration camp inmates or the fleeing refugee, at the other12.However, is not everything that vain. Human Rights exist and we can benefit from them. So, how can the Human Rights be prepared to accept the conflict of the variety of cultures which characterize our days? Some can argue that human rights are ethnicly relative alternatively than universal. The Vienna Declaration states that the signification of national and regional particularities and various historical, ethnical and religious backgrounds must be borne in mind. This puts an intentional duty towards the States to fortress and promote human rights no matter of their cultural systems. While its significance is acknowledged, cultural consideration in no way reduces States human rights duties. Human Rights are a contemporary attainment for all cultures. They reflect the dynamic, i ntegrated efforts of the international community to achieve and advance a common standard and international system of law to protect human dignity13.Human Rights are characterized from a cultural multiplicity and include in a broad sense a number of protections such as, freedom of expression, thought, religion, right to education, and protection of persons belonging to ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities, protection of the principle of non-discrimination and so on. There is greater consideration of the ways in which cultures protect the welfare of their people and illustration of the common foundation of human self-complacency on which human rights protection stands. This phenomenon would enable human rights promotion to punctuate the cultural relevance of universal human rights in various cultural contexts. Acknowledgment of particular cultural contexts would serve to smooth the progress of human rights execution and respect. Working in this way with particular cultures in herently recognizes cultural integrity and diversity, without compromising or diluting the unquestionably universal standard of human rights. Such an approach is essential to ensure that the future will be guided above all by human rights, non-discrimination, tolerance and cultural pluralism.14To conclude, it is a fact that in theory everything is much easier than in practice, because it is in the practice where the people lose control and act in a way that does not respect others. If we do not accept that each of us is different, then zilch in this world will change, nothing will improve. Discrimination against other people is something that does not bring people together, instead it pushes them apart. We are all part of the same world but what can we do to change this world for the best? Women, minority ethnic group members, and those of a different sexual orientation continue to be equal but still separate, supported by the law but unable to obtain true and complete participatio n. It is impossible for all of us to be the same but it is upon us to respect our human fellows without criticizing them, in order to be able to live in a harmonised society.