Comment on the Principles Utilized at Google to not be Evil Case Study - 1

Comment on the Principles apply at Google to not be Evil - Case Study ExampleAccording to the paper the pristine concept or principle for functioning was to not be evil this would include doing everything by the nodes preferences. Their agreement with China which allows their wait engine to be censored was the most controversial of their impacts. This move is actually not in the best interest of its end-users and is seen by many as limiting freedom of speech and liberty itself. Its ongoing battle with AT&T is also indicative of its changing standards. It seems Google has changed its office from neutrality to the survival of the fittest. While they once advocated net neutrality principles it is now increasingly more center on putting its own interests first. In a way they are effectively crushing pocket-size firms and even large competition because of its biased and tyrannical attitude. What was once a motto no longitudinal applies for Google it seems at the end of the day t here is massive copyright and trademark infringement through the search engine that is allowed and goes unchecked by the firm. Pornography and other disturbing elements are not only widely available but also advertised. So the question is, was the principle only a catchy catchword? It seems it was.