.

Monday, February 6, 2017

The Debate of the Existence of God

Abstract\nThis paper explores the list between a prof whos an atheistic and his schoolchild whos a Christian. An member was stick on by Patricia Bridewell on her website (www.patrish.com) sent to her by Phil Mathews. Phil Mathews was not the causation of the said article. at that place will be cardinal premises provided supporting the completion of the Christian student. The author thusly concluded that the contestation is inducive leading to some of the fallacies found. The author found 4 (four) crystalline fallacies present on two side of the argument: (1) annoyed Questions, (2) Appeal to Authority, (3) Appeal to Ignorance, (4) Ad Hominem-Abusive. This paper then, gave out reasons, primarily according to the article, that faith on something that one derrierenot be proven by comprehension is a way to believe that something rattling does exist. The author, then, gave out reasons why the argument of both sides are weak.\n\nKeywords: ad hominem, inductive, atheist\n \nDoes god really Exist?\nIn the article, The doubter: Professor vs the Christian Student, posted on Patricia Bridewells blogspot www.patrish.com), wherein an Atheist professor and a Christian student argue whether or not graven image does exist, thither came 3 (three) premises: (Premise 1): The Christian student claimed that the professor is functional on the premise of duality. The professor sees God as something he can measure with giving out duality; a good God and a cock-a-hoop God. When, science cant compensate fully understand the things they intent to measure things. (Premise 2): The Christian student claimed that God, according to the Bible, is letting bad things happen, to tell if people can choose good or evil by their profess free will. (Premise 3): Finally, the student claimed that if God is non-existent according to the five-spot senses, then, the professors brain, in which the five senses cannot prove exists, is non-existent as well. The shoemakers last wo uld be, according to the argument do by the professor and the Christian s...

No comments:

Post a Comment